Search blog.co.uk

I'M AT IT AGAIN

by kendrive @ 2005-12-13 - 16:10:42

BACK TO THINGS THAT NIGGLE ME.

Why do people say "Outside of", when simply "outside" is sufficient?

"The road is blocked outside of the Royal Albert Hall following a traffic accident." (Radio report)

While I have my GOM hat on, why - "He was a friend of Bill's".

Bill's what? Bill's dog, Bill's pussy?

Why not "He was a friend of Bill" or "He was one of Bill's friends".

Yes, I AM pedantic - and I know I can't stop the rot.

Trackback address for this post:

authimage

Comments, Trackbacks: Hide subcomments

jojo52jojo52 pro
13/12/05 @ 16:37

It bugs me when people say 'could of', 'would of' etc when it should be 'could have', 'would have' and I know it's the little 've sound but some people seem to think it really is of. Keep the rot out of the English language!

Bill [Visitor]

13/12/05 @ 18:07

What it is what makes my blood boil, is a sentence like this.

Leave a comment :

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.
Allowed XHTML tags: <!, p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, a, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, img>
URLs, email, AIM and ICQs will be converted automatically.
Options:
 
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email & url)
All comments except those from the author's friends will be moderated.
Validation code:
Please enter the above code here:
For protection from spambots (case-sensitive).

Footer

The content of this website belongs to a private person, blog.co.uk is not responsible for the content of this website.